Alfa Romeo of today can’t even hold
a candle to the awe-inspiring carmaker it was until the dusk of the
1980s. Its lineup is comprised of just three cars: the MiTo, the
Giulietta and the 4C. To be completely honest, only the latter lives up
to Alfisti expectations.
It’s beautifully styled, it packs a creamy turbocharged 1.75-liter
four-cylinder from the Giulietta QV with 241 horsepower, it can sprint
to 62 mph (100 km/h) in just 4.5 seconds and it weighs a featherweight
995 kilos. Those are impressive figures, alright, but what would you say
about a 4C with 738 horsepower?
More specifically 738 horsepower and a staggering 720 Nm of torque (532
lb-ft)? Baptized the 4C Definitiva by tuning firm Lazzarini Design, this
mid-engined brute doesn’t have it’s original four-pot turbo. Instead,
the tuner swapped that peppy engine with a 4.3L Ferrari V8 sourced from
the now extinct F430. But this mill isn’t the standard naturally
aspirated V8 one might find on the 458’s predecessor.
If you look closely, you’ll see a pair of big turbos and some Hennessey lettering
In addition to the power hike, just look at it’s outlandish
styling - it’s a frenzy of carbon fiber, vents, aero and badassery. And
it’s hard to say no to the rendering depicting the 4C Definitiva in
Martini Racing livery. Although the car is still in development, the
tuning outfit estimates that the first working prototype will be ready
in just a few months’ time. What about pricing?
A highly customized machine such as the Alfa 4C from the gallery below
isn’t exactly a cheap and cheerful ride. The Lazzarini Design team
estimates that the 4C Definitiva will cost around €250,000 or $310,900 /
£196,850 at current rates, which is a lot of money compared to the
€53,990 of a box standard 4C.
Don’t forget to look on the fun side of things though - this aggressive
Alfa will do the 0 to 60 mph (96 km/h) acceleration run in 2.5 seconds
and complete the quarter mile in 9.5. By comparison, the Bugatti Veyron
16.4 Grand Sport Vitesse does the previously mentioned in 2.4 and 9.9
seconds, respectively.
No comments:
Post a Comment